Opting Out: Withdrawing Consent

[FTL_Ian]

I've spent some time working on a version of Thinkfree.ca's NoU&CoR that we might be able to use here in New Hampshire.

Do you have any suggestions?

How cool would it be if several of us put the government people on notice simultaneously?

Your thoughts?

Notice of Understanding and Intent And Claim of Right

I, First Name: Family Name, a flesh and blood living individual do hereby make Oath and state the following is my Truth and my Law:

Whereas all men are born equally free and independent, and,

Whereas all government of right originates from the people and is founded in consent, and,

Whereas it is my understanding representation requires mutual consent, and,

Whereas it is my understanding that in the absence of mutual consent neither representation nor governance can exist, and,

Whereas it is my understanding people in New Hampshire have a right to revoke or deny consent to be represented and thus governed, and,

Whereas it is my understanding if anyone does revoke or deny consent they exist free of government control and statutory restraints, and,

Whereas a Freeman-on-the-Land has lawfully revoked consent and does exist free of statutory restrictions, obligations, and limitations, and,

Whereas I, First Name: Family Name am a Freeman-on-the-Land, and,

Whereas it is my understanding that acting peacefully within community standards does not breach the peace, and,

Whereas it is my understanding that any action for which one can apply for and receive a license must itself be a fundamentally lawful action, and,

Whereas as I not a child and I am a Freeman-on-the-Land who operates with full responsibility and I do not see the need to ask permission to engage in lawful and peaceful activities, especially from those who claim limited liability, and,

Whereas it is my understanding that I have a right to use my property without having to pay for the use or enjoyment of it, and,

Whereas it is my understanding peace officers have a duty to distinguish between statutes and law and those who attempt to enforce statutes against a Freeman-on-the-Land are in fact breaking the law, and,

Whereas it is my understanding that I have the power to refuse intercourse or interaction with peace officers who have not observed me breach the peace, and,

Whereas it is my understanding that permanent estoppel by acquiescence barring any peace officer or prosecutor from bringing charges against a Freeman-on-the-Land under any act or statute is created if this claim is not responded to in the stated fashion and time,

Therefore be it now known to any and all concerned and affected parties, that I, First Name: Family Name a Freeman-on-the-Land do hereby state clearly specifically and unequivocally my intent to peacefully and lawfully exist free of all statutory obligations restrictions and maintain all rights at law to trade, exchange or barter.

Furthermore, I claim that these actions are not outside my communities' standards and will in fact support said community in our desire for truth and maximum freedom.

Furthermore, I claim the right to engage in these actions and further claim that all property held by me is held under a claim of right.

Furthermore, I claim that anyone who interferes with my lawful activities after having been served notice of this claim and who fails to properly dispute or make lawful counterclaim is breaking the law, cannot claim good faith or colour of right and that such transgressions will be dealt with in a properly convened court de jure.

Furthermore, I claim my FEE SCHEDULE for any transgressions by peace officers, government principals or agents or justice system participants is 1 OZ GOLD PER HOUR, time rounded up to the nearest hour, if being questioned, interrogated or in any way detained, harassed or otherwise regulated and 5 OZ PLATINUM PER HOUR time rounded up to the nearest hour, if I am handcuffed, transported, incarcerated or subjected to any adjudication process without my express written and Notarized consent.

Furthermore, I claim the right to use a Notary Public to secure payment of the aforementioned FEE SCHEDULE against any transgressors who by their actions or omissions harm me or my interests, directly or by proxy in any way.

Furthermore, I claim the right to convene a proper court de jure in order to address any potentially criminal actions of any peace officers, government principals or agents or justice system participants who having been served notice of this claim fail to dispute or discuss or make lawful counterclaim and then interfere by act or omission with the lawful exercise of properly claimed and established rights and freedoms.

Furthermore, I claim the right to deal with any counterclaims or disputes publicly and in an open forum using discussion and negotiation and to capture on video said discussion and negotiation for whatever lawful purpose as I see fit.

Affected parties wishing to dispute the claims made herein or make their own counterclaims must respond appropriately within FOURTEEN (14) days of service of notice of this action. Responses must be under Oath or attestation, upon full commercial liability and penalty of perjury and delivered via registered mail or other, trackable, private delivery to the address below.

Failure to register a dispute against the claims made herein will result in an automatic default judgement securing forevermore all rights herein claimed and establishing permanent and irrevocable estoppel by acquiescence forevermore barring the bringing of charges under any statute or act against Freeman-on-the-Land First Name: Family Name

Place of claim of right: New Hampshire

Dated: __________________________________


Claimant: ________________________________

Notary Public: ____________________________








Use of a Notary is for attestation and verification purposes only and does not constitute a change in status or entrance or acceptance of foreign jurisdiction.


Address for response, counterclaim, or dispute:
X
X
X

[Caleb]

I think it reads a lot like a contract, with a lot of legalese, whereas I prefer the idea of a personal declaration of independence which takes a moral stance in simple terms.

[FTL_Ian]

Do you have one to post?

[Russell Kanning]

there might be one on the republic of nh site or on a thread here somewhere .... I gave one to the feds

[FTL_Ian]

there might be one on the republic of nh site or on a thread here somewhere .... I gave one to the feds

Not really.  While a good document, this reads like more of an indictment of the feds and not very much about individual liberty:
http://www.republicofnh.org/declaration.pdf

Caleb, did you have one focused more on the individual?

[Caleb]

No. but I might be willing to work one up. it just seems to me that the legalese and all that funny contract language is their language, not ours. Ours is rooted in morality, not statute. They can't win on that level, but they can whoop your ass in Legal mumbo jumbo land all day every day.

[Russell Kanning]

and they like it

[Puke]

Why not two versions? One with all the legal who-haa and one with normal English.

[Russell Kanning]

one for the attorney generals office and one for the thugs who will pick you up

[John Edward Mercier]

It may be easier broken into pieces. I find government officials elected or hired tend to have trouble with contracts.

But even my twelve year old niece gets it. She exposed that every day children wake up, get on the bus, and sit through a day of school, before riding the bus home to do homework. She wondered why the teacher didn't just e*mail the assignment home... and the child e*mail the assignment back.
Her mother queried 'What the hell would they do with the building?' My niece replied 'Sell it to someone.'

[TackleTheWorld]

Yeah, I don't like the number of time the words "law" or "lawfully" appears in the text. The courts control that term.  Plus if I'm opting out of a system why would I declare rights to recording the negotiations in the same document?  I haven't studied all the word twists the government uses, nor do I want to.  I wouldn't use their mangled definitions at all.  I like the more understandable every-day style along the lines of :
Leave me alone.

[Kat Kanning]

Lauren "Leave me alone" Canario 

[dalebert]

I haven't studied all the word twists the government uses, nor do I want to.  I wouldn't use their mangled definitions at all.  I like the more understandable every-day style along the lines of :
Leave me alone.

[srqrebel]

It would be interesting to see what kind of effect such a document would have, although my prediction is it would be sneered at by cops, dismissed as having no legal validilty by judges, and since the message is directed at the government in their own terminology, only serve to reinforce the sense of legitimacy of the government to all other observers

[Russell Kanning]

I like the document idea .... I support whatever one you decide to use Ian