9-11 was an inside job

[slave]

"We subsequently went to the stairwell and were going down the stairs, when we reached the sixth floor, the landing that we were standing on gave way, there was an explosion and the landing gave way. I was left there hanging, I had to climb back up and now had to walk back up to the eighth floor. After getting to the eighth floor everything was dark."

I've posted the video of electrical transformers exploding before, but I suppose I'll do it again.

http://www.collegeafterhours.com/content/media/movie_1270.wmv

The WTC blueprints posted earlier indicate that the seventh floor was a mechanical area, and the floor plans show a huge electrical substation in the bottom center of the diagrams.

There were undoubtedly many, many explosions during the demise of the towers, of various things.  Here's a video of an aircraft oxygen generator burning, for instance:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6i_l_ux3R-4

Just because there was an explosion, and someone heard it and survived, doesn't mean it was a demolition or an "inside job."

you mvpel you are a phycopath ...........
  you stay on this site spewing your ignorance.....and you are a lying , well lets say  you are a hore. you truly are a hore. you are a scientist.

Go away. This thread is for intelligent dialogue concerning events related to 9/11, not for name-calling

those statements with his knowledge of 911 means that he is a hore and a sphycopath. you tell me to go away ? intellegent dialogue strait to hell.
ya........ that be you .

[mvpel]

bldg 7 was blocks away.

"Blocks away?"

Who's spewing bullshit here, hmmmm?

I walked in the WTC plaza on a couple of different occasions, and have photos stashed in a box somewhere of the buildings and their surroundings.  WTC7 is about 100 meters away from the base of WTC1, and the two towers are about 450 meters high.

An interesting paper discusses the kinetic energy involved in the collapse of the buildings:

A comparison of these Q values with the initial kinetic energies, Ti (WTC 1) and Ti (WTC 2), shows that a relatively small fraction of the available energy, (6.7 % for WTC 1 and 3.3 % for WTC 2), is converted to heat by the first impact of the upper blocks of floors. Because the fractional conversion of energy to heat is even smaller for subsequent impacts, most of the kinetic energy of collapse is conserved from one floor impact to the next. Thus a rapid self-sustaining total collapse of the towers is an inevitable consequence of first order momentum transfer theory.

[slave]

bldg 7 was blocks away.

"Blocks away?"

Who's spewing bullshit here, hmmmm?

I walked in the WTC plaza on a couple of different occasions, and have photos stashed in a box somewhere of the buildings and their surroundings.  WTC7 is about 100 meters away from the base of WTC1, and the two towers are about 450 meters high.

An interesting paper discusses the kinetic energy involved in the collapse of the buildings:

A comparison of these Q values with the initial kinetic energies, Ti (WTC 1) and Ti (WTC 2), shows that a relatively small fraction of the available energy, (6.7 % for WTC 1 and 3.3 % for WTC 2), is converted to heat by the first impact of the upper blocks of floors. Because the fractional conversion of energy to heat is even smaller for subsequent impacts, most of the kinetic energy of collapse is conserved from one floor impact to the next. Thus a rapid self-sustaining total collapse of the towers is an inevitable consequence of first order momentum transfer theory.

4,5, and 8 never collapsed. the steel shells remained.
look at the map................
   and the people who think they stand up for the truth sit there and negative carma me .
  and the others?

no posts.

silence.
   

[slave]

"We subsequently went to the stairwell and were going down the stairs, when we reached the sixth floor, the landing that we were standing on gave way, there was an explosion and the landing gave way. I was left there hanging, I had to climb back up and now had to walk back up to the eighth floor. After getting to the eighth floor everything was dark."

I've posted the video of electrical transformers exploding before, but I suppose I'll do it again.

http://www.collegeafterhours.com/content/media/movie_1270.wmv

The WTC blueprints posted earlier indicate that the seventh floor was a mechanical area, and the floor plans show a huge electrical substation in the bottom center of the diagrams.

There were undoubtedly many, many explosions during the demise of the towers, of various things.  Here's a video of an aircraft oxygen generator burning, for instance:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6i_l_ux3R-4

Just because there was an explosion, and someone heard it and survived, doesn't mean it was a demolition or an "inside job."

you mvpel you are a phycopath ...........
  you stay on this site spewing your ignorance.....and you are a lying , well lets say  you are a hore. you truly are a hore. you are a scientist.

Go away. This thread is for intelligent dialogue concerning events related to 9/11, not for name-calling

intelegent dialogue.......?
yoiu think your science will pull the wool over everyones eyes? 

       not this guy.

if it walks like a duck
and talks like a duck
and looks like a duck
it's probably a duck

you are a fake.
a concious liar.

[Insurgent]

"We subsequently went to the stairwell and were going down the stairs, when we reached the sixth floor, the landing that we were standing on gave way, there was an explosion and the landing gave way. I was left there hanging, I had to climb back up and now had to walk back up to the eighth floor. After getting to the eighth floor everything was dark."

I've posted the video of electrical transformers exploding before, but I suppose I'll do it again.

http://www.collegeafterhours.com/content/media/movie_1270.wmv

The WTC blueprints posted earlier indicate that the seventh floor was a mechanical area, and the floor plans show a huge electrical substation in the bottom center of the diagrams.

There were undoubtedly many, many explosions during the demise of the towers, of various things.  Here's a video of an aircraft oxygen generator burning, for instance:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6i_l_ux3R-4

Just because there was an explosion, and someone heard it and survived, doesn't mean it was a demolition or an "inside job."

you mvpel you are a phycopath ...........
  you stay on this site spewing your ignorance.....and you are a lying , well lets say  you are a hore. you truly are a hore. you are a scientist.

Go away. This thread is for intelligent dialogue concerning events related to 9/11, not for name-calling

intelegent dialogue.......?
yoiu think your science will pull the wool over everyones eyes? 

       not this guy.

if it walks like a duck
and talks like a duck
and looks like a duck
it's probably a duck

you are a fake.
a concious liar.

I'm sorry for saying "go away". What I should have written is that "This thread is for intelligent dialogue concerning events related to 9/11, not for name-calling. Disrespect, countless misspelled words, incomplete sentences and lashing out will likely result in negative karma and possibly the ignore button, from many readers. Thoughtful and researched replies are welcome" 

[roland787]

i believe that one of the hijackers of 9/11 was Jesus in disguise coming back to smite this country for electing an evil monkey for president.

[error]

No way. Al Gore invented 9/11!

[roland787]

Al Gore is God and that's why he sent in Jesus to hijack one of the planes.

[jaqeboy]

Another really interesting talk coming up put on by the Seacoast 911 Questions group:

http://newhampshireunderground.com/forum/index.php?topic=9387.0

If we work up a carpool plan for this talk, we'll post it at http://merrimackvalley911truth.org - and probably here, too.

[mvpel]

4,5, and 8 never collapsed. the steel shells remained.

Yes, and of course they were constructed in exactly the same way as the buildings which did collapse, and suffered exactly the same sort of forces, damage, and fire as the others, right?

No?

Well, gee... 

[Braddogg]

Article by a great libertarian writer Wilt Alston on 9/11 here, entitled "Conspiracy Realists of the World Unite!"  Critical of the official story.

[Insurgent]

Thanks for the link, Braddogg--really good article! Concise, engaging and hard-hitting. It hits the nail on the head, particularly concerning the  vapid argument that "the government can't deliver the mail on time--how could they pull this off"!

[Braddogg]

Yeah.  It was very well-written article, thought y'all would enjoy it.  I'm certainly not buying whatever the government is selling (Wilt made a good point -- the gov't was able to ID the terrorists very quickly by cross-referencing intel watch lists with passenger lists).  But I really don't think the scientific and visual evidence confirms the theory of controlled demolition.  I like how Wilt ends the article

[jaqeboy]

Another really interesting talk coming up put on by the Seacoast 911 Questions group:

http://newhampshireunderground.com/forum/index.php?topic=9387.0

If we work up a carpool plan for this talk, we'll post it at http://merrimackvalley911truth.org - and probably here, too.

Looks like we have 3 from Nashua interested in going to this - maybe meet up at the Exit 8 Park&Ride lot again - details when the date gets closer.

[jaqeboy]

"9/11: Total Proof That Bombs Were Planted In The Buildings!" - interviews with eyewitnesses

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8n-nT-luFIw&mode=related&search