Main thread for Ed and Elaine Brown vs the evil IRS, Part 35

[JosephSHaas]

I did just receive this in my inbox, of an e-mail to an attachment entitled: STATEMENT OF ISSUES on 38 pages starting off with an ADMINISTRATIVE NOTICE *, and to page 5 for Title 5 U.S. Code Section 7311 http://vlex.com/vid/sec-loyalty-and-striking-19265021 in that: "An individual may not accept or HOLD a position in the Government of the United States or the government of the District of Columbia if he - (1) advocates the overthrow of our constitutional form of government;" (emphasis ADDed for the word "hold" defined as "To have the position of; occupy"**

** See also the word: occupation: "An activity that serves as one's regular source of livelihood", but that it ALSO means: "The invasion, conquest, and CONTROL of a nation or territory by a foreign military force." (emphasis ADDed for in this case, The Federal "control" over us Article 12, New Hampshire "inhabitants" withOUT our "Consent" as there has been no filing by the G.S.A./ General Services Administration landlord of her 40USC255 to 40USC3112 papers by 1-8-17 U.S. Constitution to our N.H. R.S.A. Ch. 123:1 N.H. Office of Secretary of State. Thus her tenants of The U.S. Attorney, nor U.S. Marshal, nor either of that Article III, Section 1 "inferior Court of Congress" or the Article I, Section 8, Clause 9 "Tribunal" to have no jurisdictional authority OVER us! The U.S. Attorney KNOWS this in his culpable mental state by his own U.S. Attorney Manual #664  but does otherwise! http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/eousa/foia_reading_room/usam/title9/crm00664.htm

So what we have here is a crime by this Federal principle or PRIME non-mover for her agent not doing their job! And him, meaning our governor, NOT doing his job either! His Article 51 job of to enforce all legislative mandates by the "shall" word in RSA 123:1 of to at least send a written invitation to that Federal officer to comply with both the law and the legal of the United States Constitution and the State statute.  An act rather than omission that he/ the governor, by Article 41 "shall be responsible for".  http://www.nh.gov/constitution/governor.html

Thus because he REFUSES to act, then so be it for the charge of Official Oppression against him! http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/LXII/643/643-1.htm R.S.A. Chapter "643:1 Official Oppression. – A public servant, as defined in RSA 640:2, II, is guilty of a misdemeanor if, with a purpose to benefit himself or another or to harm another, he knowingly commits an unauthorized act which purports to be an act of his office; or knowingly REFRAINS from performing a duty imposed on him by law or clearly inherent in the nature of his office." (emphasis ADDed.)

Thus to file this Complaint #2010-_______ in the Concord District Court immediately after that House Bill of Address by State Rep. Dan Itse of Fremont against District Court Chief Judge Edwin W. Kelly of Plymouth who has his office in the Johnson Building over on Pleasant Street, in Concord, N.H. (My former tenant's attorney in the 1984 Tax Sale against me when I was a landlord for a corporate owner in Ashland, N.H. 1978-1995, of the year after the 1994 Sheriff's Sale, and so to see footnote #1 below.)

The Feds being foreign invaders to our state soil with their militant actions, from the word militate of using force as evidence to offset what evidence we have of the federal non-filing that was REFUSED to be marked as an exhibit for the trial jury to weigh in reaching their verdicts for both Ed & Elaine Brown, plus their three helpers of: Cirino Gonzalez, Danny Riley, and Jason Gerhard (plus Bob Wolffe).

-* The ADMIN. NOTICE having this summary: "(O)ne of the meanings that fraud bears," and "in its elements common law sense" is that of "deceit" [ 483 U.S. 372 ] It "includes the deliberate concealment of material information in a setting of fiduciary obligation.  A public official is a fiduciary to us the public".  And anyone who "deliberately conceals material information...is guilty of fraud. McMullan v. United States 483 U.S. 350 (1987)".

Yours truly, - - Joe Haas
____________________________________
footnotes:

1. RSA Ch. 528:16 http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/LIV/528/528-16.htm Where are the "two adjoining towns" posters? if any.

2. RSA Ch. 123:1 http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/IX/123/123-1.htm Where is the "accurate description and plan of the lands so owned and occupied, verified by the oath of some officer of the United States having knowledge of the facts"? and them both NOT on file with the N.H. Office of Secretary of State, right? Yes or No. _____

3. RSA Ch. 21-J:14-b,I.(a) http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/I/21-J/21-J-14-b.htm Where are the "Guidelines"? for the purpose of: "relating to the administration of the property tax" for to "protect" our Article 12 N.H. "inhabitants"! http://www.nh.gov/constitution/billofrights.html of: "...Nor are the inhabitants of this state controllable by any other laws than those to which they, or their representative body, have given their consent."

[JosephSHaas]

RE: http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100308/NEWS01/3080317

and: http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100308/NEWS01/3080317#comment-116174

entitled: "Two wrongs do NOT make a right! (Concord COPs corrupt!) "

of: "Right church, wrong pew as they say.

Actually all of them with the exception of Conboy who was not there in 2007, ought to be arrested for RSA Ch. 643:1 of Official Oppression in allowing the Feds to PULL case #2007-0745 of Dan Riley v. The Superintendent of the Strafford County Jail, Warren  Dowaliby  in Dover to the Feds when by the Feds' own U.S. Code or Statutes At Large only a Defendant can PUSH it to there, and so NOT the Federal Intervenor in the case.

Furthermore, what happened to these judges' RSA Ch. 92:2 oaths of office http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/VI/92/92-2.htm   to honor the law? The law of Article 12 in our N.H. Constitution, Part First and Bill of Rights in that: "...Nor are the inhabitants of this state controllable by any other laws than those to which they, or their representative body, have given their consent." http://www.nh.gov/constitution/billofrights.html to wit: On June 14, 1883 we the people, through our State Legislature or the N.H. General Court, gave a conditional consent to the Feds by our RSA Ch. 123:1 http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/IX/123/123-1.htm but that they have YET accept it*, to file their 40USC255 to 40USC3112 papers there with our N.H. Office of Secretary of State.  It's the law in Article I, Section 8, Clause 17 of the U.S. Constitution for our "Consent" and by the legal of this statute here and in many other states http://www.constitution.org/juris/fjur/1fj-ba.htm (like to the Florida governor, NOT done either.)  * = according to the Adams case of 1943 at the U.S. Supreme Court (David Hacket Souter - are you reading this?), an offer un-accepted is NOT consent.

See also the Concord COP oaths for this "federal" word therein that is NOT supposed to be there!  Thus the end does NOT justify the means in THIS and many OTHER criminal cases brought by them as corrupt! because we are supposed to have BOTH procedural AND substantive due process of law.  It's supposed to be a guarantee by the 5th + 14th Amendments, and our Article 14 right to be "complete".

So Brian, to file some Motion to Dismiss, because although you might have done wrong, two wrongs do not make a right!"

[keith in RI]

Keith or Donna: What's that website with the photocopy of the gold-sealed document of there being no federal filing in New Hampshire as required by R.S.A. Chapter 123:1? I remember seeing it once, but that I forget the location to type into the address bar. 

freethebrowns.com

specifically here:
http://freethebrowns.com/?page_id=27

[JosephSHaas]

....

...
http://freethebrowns.com/?page_id=27

Thanks.

[JosephSHaas]

Hey! Has anybody heard from Steve Swan lately?

Check this out:

http://dockets.justia.com/browse/state-new_hampshire/court-nhdce/judge-Singal/

- - Joe
__________________________________________________________

Mod:  According to: http://www.bop.gov/iloc2/InmateFinderServlet?Transaction=NameSearch&needingMoreList=false&FirstName=Steven&Middle=A.&LastName=Swan&Race=W&Sex=M&Age=&x=67&y=17

1.      STEVEN A SWAN     00259-049      57-White-M     10-23-2009      RELEASED

Steve, WHERE are you?  What's going on with your civil case against the Feds?

In trying to find your current address, I found: http://www.quatloos.com/Tax_Protestor_Swan_arrested.htm re: that old story of when you sued Irwin Schiff, him now in Prison I think he is there.

Did you ever get your $250.00 back from the court? http://www.websupp.org/data/DNH/1:05-cv-00401-35-DNH.pdf  Monier owes me over $300.00 on a check that "bounced" at the local National Bank in Concord. I sued him criminally in the Concord District Court, and to return there after that House Address #__ against Judge Edwin W. Kelly, yet to process, see HA1, 2 + 3 so far over at: http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/bill_status/ just type in HA1  HA2  HA3  etc.

I see that the Boston judges were of no help: http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=1st&navby=case&no=981289

______________________________________________________________

Modification #2:

According to: http://www.bop.gov/iloc2/InmateFinderServlet?Transaction=NameSearch&needingMoreList=false&FirstName=Robert&Middle=&LastName=Wolffe&Race=W&Sex=M&Age=&x=77&y=12

1.      ROBERT WOLFFE     09879-049      52-White-M     11-16-2009      RELEASED

Bob, How's it going? Hey! When I get that appointment to meet with the Insurance agent for the City of Lebanon dealing with why the City took property tax $money and delivered NO Article 12 protection, you're also invited to that meeting. *

Best wishes, -- Joe

P.S. The U.S. PROPERTY / NO / TRESPASSING  sign in red, white and blue (in black, white and black letters). Is it still there?

http://nhunderground.com/forum/index.php?action=profile;u=1592;area=showposts;start=240
______________________________________________________________

* Valerie says he's not interested.

http://www.google.com/#hl=en&q=%22Robert+Wolffe%22+Vermont+&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=%22Robert+Wolffe%22+Vermont+&fp=3d121c88310e67e3

"Phonebook results for "Robert Wolffe" Vermont
   
Robert Wolffe     (802) 565-8017     22 Highland Ave,  Randolph, VT 05060     Map"

_________________________________________________________-

What's Tom Colantuono-crap doing these days?  Or has he crapped out all that garbage he was brainwashed into accepting over there from the national brothers of the Washington Bar? Citing more George Orwellian "1984" and "double-speak"?  re: http://www.justice.gov/tax/usaopress/2004/txdv04WEM20Swan20sent.pdf of June 24, 2007 in the Swan case of: "All citizens MUST pay their fair share of the costs of the FREEDOM and privileges of living in this country...(to) pay any tax due." (emphasis ADDed, for NOT a shall or mandatory condition, but of the voluntary option in the 16th Amendment of to lay meaning to either apply or impose.  I choose the former over the latter.  Of NOT to lay, as in the levy or collect, BUT to lay, as in to apply, and say: request: DENIED! a tax in it's essential characteristics is NOT a debt; re: that N.J. case in (Henry Campbell) Black's Law Dictionary, 5th edition (c)1979 @ page 1307. ) Some of us have ALREADY paid our fair share (past tense)! And usually of HOW by it being extracted by unlawful and illegal means! Thieves!!

According to   http://www.biancopa.com/whoweare/thomascolantuono.html   he's over at: Bianco Professional Association Attorneys At Law, 18 Centre Street Concord, NH 03301    Telephone: 603-225-7170    800-262-8112   I did just give him a call to see if he has (past tense) seen the light, as what former prosecutor Bruce Kenea did as from a prosecutor to a defender, or do I have to keep saying to him to: "Wise up"? My voice mail to him yet to be returned.

[JosephSHaas]

RE: http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100310/OPINION/3100305

and: http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100310/OPINION/3100305#comment-116711

from: http://www.concordmonitor.info/comment/reply/121985/116671

entitled: "So can this thief also be called a petty potentate? P.P."

of: "Hey Al, you're using some might big words here, like potentate: "One who has the power AND position to rule OVER others" (emphasis ADDed, for BOTH the power PLUS position, the latter word defined as "A situation relative to circumstances" defined as: "of the conditions or facts attending an event and having some bearing upon it." and the former of meaning either: (1) strength as in might as in to take militant action, from the word militate meaning "To have force as evidence" OR (2)"The ability of capacity to exercise control; authority.")

So back to this story of the thief having BOTH definitions of the word power of: force AND the ability, but that of exercising what TYPE of control? Un-lawful control!

Thus can we still call the thief a potentate? or does it have to be lawful? I think from your example of foreign potentates to over here to see how we the people deal with such after a bow or a kiss of the feet by our President, that we have got to do what? Follow the leader? Only IF you volunteer to be one in his Army, as COMMANDER-in-Chief.  Not for me. The Federalies to do step #1 in my book, and YOUR book too, and that is when in New Hampshire here they report to base of operations before their next maneuver: To the Office of Secretary of State with those papers as required by the "shall" word in the statute: R.S.A. Ch. 123:1. It's a "condition" put upon them. Our conditional offer of Article I, Section 8, Clause 17 "Consent" that has yet to be accepted, and so by the Adams case in the U.S. Supreme Court of 1943: an offer un-accepted is NOT consent.

NOW be the time to file BEFORE some big-time thief gets away with some violation of U.S. Code this or Statute at Large that because of the FAILure of the Feds to comply with the law: that of procedural due process of law (as guaranteed to them too, by the Amendments 5 + 14 to the U.S. Constitution.) A technically you might say?  So what? It's The Rule of Law! Thank you for another opportunity to expose this Federal corruption here in N.H. and the law-enforcement (so-called) at the local, county and State levels who do NOTHING to protect us Article 12 "inhabitants"!"

[JosephSHaas]

Corr links is shut down:

https://www.corrlinks.com/Error.aspx?aspxerrorpath=/BrowserCheck.aspx

"Server Error in '/' Application.
Runtime Error
Description: An application error occurred on the server. The current custom error settings for this application prevent the details of the application error from being viewed remotely (for security reasons). It could, however, be viewed by browsers running on the local server machine.

Details: To enable the details of this specific error message to be viewable on remote machines, please create a <customErrors> tag within a "web.config" configuration file located in the root directory of the current web application. This <customErrors> tag should then have its "mode" attribute set to "Off".

<!-- Web.Config Configuration File -->

<configuration>
    <system.web>
        <customErrors mode="Off"/>
    </system.web>
</configuration>


Notes: The current error page you are seeing can be replaced by a custom error page by modifying the "defaultRedirect" attribute of the application's <customErrors> configuration tag to point to a custom error page URL.

<!-- Web.Config Configuration File -->

<configuration>
    <system.web>
        <customErrors mode="RemoteOnly" defaultRedirect="mycustompage.htm"/>
    </system.web>
</configuration>  "

[JosephSHaas]

Singal: you thief!, Where's my money?

Bill Collector call by me to him this afternoon.

Get with it! Get with the program 18USC3232.

[JosephSHaas]

RE: http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100317/NEWS01/3170354

and: http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100317/NEWS01/3170354#comment-118376

entitled: ""Roberts Rules of Order": pay 2008 BEFORE 2010."

of: "Stand in line there Lynchie boy and wait your turn!

The Federalies owe me $500 first.

re: my trip over to Portland, Maine in the Ed Brown case as an uncalled witness.

McAuliffe's appointment of Singal to hear the case, but where?

18 USC 3232 ALL proceedings SHALL be held in the District of where the crime occurred.

Unfortunately ALL means SOME to these Federal thieves! Theft of my time and gas money!

George Orwellian "Nineteen Eighty Four" Double-talkers!        Shut up, and Pay! "

[JosephSHaas]

Private Search for whatever at:

"Startpage's New Proxy Service!"

Startpage's New Proxy Service!

http: // www dot youtube dot com / watch?v=qv3SCbI5KFM#ws

of: 2:48 minutes seen 33,104 times.

[JosephSHaas]

RE: http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100324/FRONTPAGE/3240310&template=single

and: http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100324/FRONTPAGE/3240310#comment-120214

entitled: "No judge? Not LEGAL judge when there anyway."

of: "Re: Paragraph #3: " Other than confirming his name and his title with the defunct firm, Financial Resources Mortgage, Farah refused to respond to frustrated investors who gave him millions of dollars"

Name, rank and serial #, eh?

Re: Paragraph #10: " there was no judge present".

Here come da judge, like in that Roman & Martin "Laugh-In"?

Pull the curtain away from this "Wizard of Oz" - like character of a judge and you will find no N.H. RSA Ch. 123:1 filing as required by the law!

http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/IX/123/123-1.htm "

[JosephSHaas]

RE: http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100325/NEWS01/3250384

and: http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100325/NEWS01/3250384#comment-120829

entitled: "Individual rights still prevail here in N.H."

of: "Re: "State Rep. Matthew Houde, a Plainfield Democrat, said the amendment would not likely stand up to a legal challenge because of the U.S. Constitution's supremacy clause, which states that federal law supercedes state law. "

Say what!? A "legal" challenge!? The Constitution IS the law, as in NOT legal, BUT lawful! There is no such thing as an unconstitutional law, but that of an unlawful statute. 

Amazing that this guy is from a Vermont Law School AND is a professor there!

The "supremacy clause" is in Article VI, Section 2: This Constitution AND the Laws of the United States WHICH SHALL BE MADE IN * * PURSUANCE * * thereof...shall be the supreme Law of the Land..." (emphasis ADDed for NOT pursuant to, as "In accordance with", BUT in pursuance thereof, meaning: "A carrying out or putting into effect.)

So by Article I, Section 8, Clause 17 of the United States Constitution, there needs to be a "Consent" from the state, that DOES and does NOT exist: in that yes - there is an accord, or agreement, but of what type? A conditional agreement by our RSA Ch. 123:1  that by the Adams case of the U.S. Supreme Court in 1943 said that an offer un-accepted is NOT Consent! We did offer the Feds jurisdictional authority here, but that because there is NO federal filing with the N.H. Secretary of State, there is not group consent, but that of what an individual can or does NOT have to agree with. And so no need for this Bradley Amendment.  http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/IX/123/123-1.htm

Read Article 12 of our N.H. Bill of Rights: "...Nor are the inhabitants of this state controllable by any other laws than those to which they, or their representative body, have given their consent." http://www.nh.gov/constitution/billofrights.html "

[Kat Kanning]

http://www.infowars.com/the-strange-case-of-kristopher-sickles-and-the-hutaree-militia/



Is one of those guys Bob Wolffe?

[JosephSHaas]

http://www.infowars.com/the-strange-case-of-kristopher-sickles-and-the-hutaree-militia/



Is one of those guys Bob Wolffe?

It sure does look like him.  WHERE are the names in this story? Maybe at another link? There sure are a lot of Replies to this over there, including one about Ed & Elaine. see:

"websuspect Says:
March 30th, 2010 at 5:32 am

So this is the deal? Anyone who gets arrested by the feds gets sheep dipped? Oh sorry. Your arrested in Federal Prison. The "Truth" movement will disavow you. You suck. Your a nut case. Your a looser.

Just like Elaine Brown, Ed Brown and Charles Dyer.

Thanks for your patriotism. Bye now. Dont come back.

What should we do if Alex gets arrested or Kurt Nimo or the video guy?
Oh Sorry well, Work hazzard. You should have known. Bye. Enjoy Prison."

Your welcome? No; You're welcome.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Mod: I heard on the NBC Nightly News last night that the oldest man arrested was 40-something, Bob's 50+ years old. - Joe

[KBCraig]

http://www.infowars.com/the-strange-case-of-kristopher-sickles-and-the-hutaree-militia/



Is one of those guys Bob Wolffe?

It sure does look like him.  WHERE are the names in this story?

Yahoo says they are (from top left): David Brian Stone Sr.; David Brian Stone Jr.; Jacob Ward; Tina Mae Stone; Michael David Meeks; Kristopher T. Sickles; Joshua John Clough; and Thomas William Piatek.

http://news.yahoo.com/nphotos/federal-indictment-Matthew-Stone/photo//100329/480/urn_publicid_ap_org9d113c9db73649a7a89085871364b5bb//s:/ap/us_fbi_raids