Main thread for Ed and Elaine Brown vs the evil IRS, Part 35

[DonnaVanMeter]

Here is Reno's Twitter info for updates on what he is up to and how he is doing. I'm not sure if I had posted it previously or not, so here it is again.

http://twitter.com/FREE_RENO_NOW

[JosephSHaas]

Here is Reno's Twitter info for updates on what he is up to and how he is doing. I'm not sure if I had posted it previously or not, so here it is again.

http://twitter.com/FREE_RENO_NOW

Thanks, plus: Re: "#    went to breakfast; had uncooked pancakes; word is that they were not cooked because they used 'cake batter' instead.     10:06 AM Apr 11th  via web"

My guess is that they were lacking baking soda, like from the Trona Mine* out west in Wyoming that I just saw on the History Channel late Saturday night/ early Sunday morning.

See:  http://www.history.com/schedule/4/11#morning for the "Modern Marvels" segment entitled: "Fry It."  They go #___ feet down and #___ miles through a tunnel to bore the stuff out.

* http://www.wma-minelife.com/trona/tronmine/data0000.htm   -- Joe  cc: Reno

[JosephSHaas]

RE: http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100412/FRONTPAGE/4120302

and: http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100412/FRONTPAGE/4120302#comment-124804

"The Council already does Re-views.
New By JosephSHaas on Mon, 04/12/2010 - 18:36

From personal experience of a correction needed in the oaths of office of the police officers having NOT been in accordance with the state statutes (RSA Ch. 42:1 and 92:2 to Article 84) I made my written complaint to the City Council, and guess what they did?

They, like a teacher with a red pencil, corrected the police. They now have oaths in compliance with the law. At least the Chief does as I have a copy of his new oath that he signed on February 11th, 2010. The old one going back to the 1980s was a dud."

[DonnaVanMeter]

Lawsuit Claims IRS Raid Led to Suicide
http://www.wishtv.com/dpp/news/local/marion_county/lawsuit-claims-irs-raid-led-to-suicide

[JosephSHaas]

Lawsuit Claims IRS Raid Led to Suicide
http://www.wishtv.com/dpp/news/local/marion_county/lawsuit-claims-irs-raid-led-to-suicide

Thanks Donna,

I did just try to post the following comment over to there, but that I guess it needs moderator approval first:

"Thanks for the info Charles, but that there is a more basic ground for a lawsuit here by the widower and his 10-year old daughter, and that is: do the Feds have 1-8-17 Consent to operate there in Indiana? To that I mean from Article I, Section 8, Clause 17 of the U.S. Constitution to Title 62, Chapter 10, section 62-1002 [13993] [ see: www dot constitution.org/juris/fjur/1fj-ba dot htm for the national list*] of did that Federal agent, like the Tile 40 U.S. Code 255 to 40USC3112 G.S.A. Landlord, Martha Johnson of The General Services Administration ever file those papers as required by the "shall" word in the state statute with the governor*? for her tenant court on Federal land. An Article III, Section 1 "inferior court of Congress" in the Legislative branch rather than an Art. I, Sec. 8, Clause 9 Judicial Tribunal, being the tenant. If not then there is no jurisdictional authority! because by the Adams case of 1943 at the U.S. Supreme Court an offer of conditional consent un-accepted is NOT consent. Thus a violation of his right to procedural due process of law that is supposed to be a guarantee by the 5th & 14th Amendments. And if you're thinking of the supremacy clause in Art. VI, Section 1, think again, as it's not pursuant to with a t, but the letter c for in pursuance thereof of beyond the contract to that of having been put into effect. The U.S. Attorney knows this too by his Manual #664. Thus to get proof of non-filing from the state as evidence to use against these militants from the word militate = to use force as evidence. Good luck, "MrTideman" in N.H. where I found out that there is no filing here to our RSA Ch. 123:1 to the Secretary of State* nor to the governor* in Florida either. Check out the N.C. statute too of exempting both the land and buildings from having to pay the property taxes.  Not so in either N.H. by RSA 123:2 nor in Indiana either by [13994] to only exempt the land, so maybe to contact the Assessor to send them a tax $bill! (;-) "     - - Joe

P.S. To send a copy to Danny in Terra Haute, Indiana (by e-mail also to brother Billy) who might know of some fellow inmates in this same boat who could benefit by having this investigated to see if there be that filing to the governor, and if not, then to file a Petition for Habeas Corpus, and if not granted then to collaterally attack by a Rule 63 case in another district to where they were sent FROM Indiana to a better state of the Feds maybe in compliance there. Then it could ricochet back to help not only Danny, but Reno and Jason too, plus of course our leaders: Ed & Elaine.

[JosephSHaas]

RE: http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100414/FRONTPAGE/4140302

and: http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100414/FRONTPAGE/4140302#comment-125276

entitled & of:

"Executive discretion to his Federal buddies gets him a bonus!?
New By JosephSHaas on Wed, 04/14/2010 - 13:04

To read this later*, and right off the bat: I'd say: no! he doesn't deserve it. WHY should somebody who allows policy to over-ride a statute get a raise.!? In the quasi judiciary with the County Attorney it's called prosecutorial discretion. So what do we have now: executive discretion to avoid the law!?

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
* update from the 12:48 p.m. posting. I see nobody commented about the paragraph #8 of: "The city is again dealing with a budget gap upwards of $3 million".

Solution: send the Feds the tax bill for their $100 million buildings over there since by RSA Ch. 123:2 [ see: http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/IX/123/123-2.htm from: http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/NHTOC/NHTOC-IX-123.htm ] only the land is exempt. Check it out: North Carolina exempts BOTH the L&B, [ see: http://www.constitution.org/juris/fjur/1fj-ba.htm ] but Indiana and N.H. only exempt the land. WHY doesn't New Hampshire do like what Indiana does? Send them the tax bill for over $2 million and then there'd only be a million dollar gap."

[DonnaVanMeter]

Posted over on quatloos
http://volokh.com/2010/04/14/the-second-amendment-and-the-takings-clause/

[JosephSHaas]

Posted over on quatloos
http://volokh.com/2010/04/14/the-second-amendment-and-the-takings-clause/

Thanks Donna.  I've posted this over at The "Concord Monitor"* even though it's now off the main page and into the archives there.  Just that if and when somebody looks into my Archives there they can find this there. -- Joe

* http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100411/NEWS01/4110384#comment-125660

From: http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100411/NEWS01/4110384

[JosephSHaas]

RE: http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100418/FRONTPAGE/4180342

and: http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100418/FRONTPAGE/4180342#comment-126092

entitled & of:

"Article 12 N.H. inhabitants ought to stand their ground...
New By JosephSHaas on Sun, 04/18/2010 - 10:36

...against becoming a Federalist.

$2,500 a case to get somebody on the "federal" program?

How much does he get as a kickback from the Feds?

Case in point of The N.H. Dept. of Revenue NOT going after Elaine Brown in Superior Court for alleged license violations to pay them a cut or piece of the action at her Dental Practice in Lebanon, but buckling under to get a kickback from the Feds on their case against Ed Brown too."

[JosephSHaas]

RE: http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100418/FRONTPAGE/4180342

and:  http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100418/FRONTPAGE/4180342#comment-126223

entitled: "Here's how I think Smukler will rule:"

of: "Re: "4. Kelly Ayotte and Deputy AG Bud Fitch responded to an executive council inquiry regarding this case last March during Kelly's reappointment hearings. Kelly lied numerous times in her response. Attorney General Michael Delaney and
Deputy AG Fitch are doing everything possible to continue the cover-up.

5. The tie-in to this story is that regulators are asking questions of the
attorney involved, as they should. But in this case the regulators-the
Professional Conduct Committee and investigators from the attorney
general's office and the U.S. attorney's office are particpating in the cover-
up."
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

The common denominator of these two cases is that the attorney involved would, of course, like to be regulated by one of their "brothers of the bar" than have to face an executive branch official in a check-and-balance.

Since Ayotee lied, then WHY isn't the County Attorney seeking an indictment against her for perjury? Because she's a "Sister of the Bar"? Is there a Grand Jury member reading this for to do an RSA Chapter 600:3 "diligent...inquir"y investigation? http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/LIX/600/600-3.htm

This attorney here of Dan Dargon trying to "to get (his) client on the top of the (loan) underwriter's pile" by what? A speed-up $fee? like they used to pay to the Probate Court judges years ago. Whatever is given over to the bank can be made available to the banking commissioner, right?  So WHY does the commissioner want more? To see WHO he contacts and HOW the letters are written and with WHAT info about these federal programs that get them whatever?  I commend the attorney for his business savvy and look to his work-papers with the client as PRIVATE but of NOT those PARTS of the client's file presented to the bank.  Those are the ONLY papers that should be regulated of WHEN they are on the desk of the bank loan officer's desk. In other words to investigate the apple put on the desk but not the entire tree.*

Too bad the people this attorney deals with at the federal level don't play by the same rules, as in you tax the apples but never the tree! I.R.S. thieves who get the FULL cooperation of the N.H. Dept. of Revenue Administration to buckle under to their demands, even against Article 12 inhabitants like Ed Brown who did file a similar court action for to assert his rights, but because he was NOT a member of the Bar, the judge took it upon herself to do what? Let some U.S. Code over-ride our constitution!? Disgusting! Thoroughly disgusting! She's now been retired for two years, but WHERE and WHEN was there ever that annual review of her Article 36 retirement pay?  She's un-deserving of accepting this for what she did! Shame on her AND those State Reps who KNOW this, because ignorance of the law is no excuse!"

[DonnaVanMeter]

HEADS UP from Cirino Gonzalez.

tomorrow is a special day, becareful around government buildings.

this is not insider intelligence, just common knowledge that most are not "aware" of; after all this is a 10 day nation...

there are increasing attacks happening on government buildings. at some point, the second wavers will get active... you will hear it be called something along the lines of "copycat" crimes, none the less, the damage will be done and yet not reported on the mainstream media, not for the real reasons anyways...

be vigilant, say nothing stupid and do nothing stupid. just keep an eye out, this is getting out of hand, i am no longer certain if anyone is incharge any more... too many double and triple agents running around. money getting lost and many making personal power plays within many operations; both private and corp. wise...

it is like when the mobs lose control of the turf for a bit and the younger ones pull a few plays... it is like that but with everyone.

it could still be a while, but as i said tomorrow is a special day.

reno

[JosephSHaas]

HEADS UP from Cirino Gonzalez.

tomorrow is a special day, be careful around government buildings....

No problem.  I went to one courthouse twice, two city libraries, a City Hall, and two Post Offices, plus the U.S. Census in two locations NOT on government turf as required by 1-8-17 to tell them in no uncertain terms that he, Robert H. Mills of the Census at 166 Loudon Road in Concord ought to get his boss to have a main office AT the Federal Building OWNed by them AND to make sure that his landlord of there files her papers with the N.H. Secretary of State.  - - Joe

[JosephSHaas]

Posted over on quatloos...the-second-amendment-and-the-takings-clause....

Thanks Donna.  I've posted this over at The "Concord Monitor"*....

According to Bernie this is a 10+ page opinion.  Elaine just wrote that her attorney had sent her a copy being forwarded to Ed, because she asked WHY McAuliffe put in that money laundering stuff when he specifically told the jury that that was NOT to be what they base their verdict on.  Re: the Money Orders he got at the P.O. in increments of this and that of below the reporting amounts to save the Postmaster having to fill out the forms to make those payments to the bank to pay off his mortgage. -- Joe

[JosephSHaas]

What's happened to Joe Haas?

You are not reading me?  I posted several days ago that Joe is spending some time with his mother in Tallahassee.

1. Jet Fuel...
2. The Florida statute...
3. The Florida Div. of State Lands...
Yours truly, - - Joe H.
P.S.
(1) The Public Utilities Commission...
(2) SHOW-CAUSE HEARING....
pc 1: Stephen R. Monier, U.S. Marshall ...

pc 2: The N.H. State Police too, with my donation of: $1.00 to a special protection fund for the Browns for them to set up at some bank, not needed though, because the Browns too through their ATT Corp. of the Dental Practice used to pay the State Corporations taxes too, but gave up when they thought, what has now been confirmed, that there would be no state-protection from the State against the Feds either, a situation I intend to change by the start of my contribution to this either special fund, or the General Fund, via the State Treasurer, etc.

* So if anybody here from Florida ... Best wishes to the truth seekers!

A work in progress.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

First Draft Complaint to the R.S.A. Chapter 541-B:1-23 State Board of Claims. http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/NHTOC/NHTOC-LV-541-B.htm

NOW COMES the Complainant, Joseph S. Haas, of P.O. Box 3842, Concord, N.H. 03302, Tel. 603: 848-6059, e-mail: JosephSHaas at hotmail dot com with Power of Attorney documents from both: Ed & Elaine Brown, plus P.O.A.'s also from: Daniel J. Riley, Cirino Gonzalez, and Jason Gerhard, and claims damages for them in the dollar amount of: $250,000 each being the maximum amount allowed by statute of personal injury to their well being of having been incarcerated for "correction" by the Feds, meaning the Federal government agents of the United States of America who had and still have no jurisdictional authority within this state of New Hampshire due to their failure to file.**

Enclosed please find my check #_______ in the amount of: $125.00 representing the $25.00 filing fee per case for each of the five individuals here, to please process from here to the Merrimack County Superior Court for a trial by jury as guaranteed by Article 20 of the N.H. Constitution, Part First & Bill of Rights. http://www.nh.gov/constitution/billofrights.html

** The non-filing being that of there being no such Title 40 U.S. Code Section 255 to 3112 paperwork http://www.oscn.net/applications/oscn/deliverdocument.asp?citeid=393575  and http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/40/usc_sec_40_00003112----000-.html  respectfully, having been filed by the "head" of "agency", currently: Martha Johnson, Administrator of the G.S.A.: General Services Administration, , 1800 F Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20405, Phone: (202) 501-0800. by ralph.conner at gsa.gov first contacted about this by e-mail of:   Thu 11/19/09 11:27 PM but NOTHING done in over five months ! ! ! ! ! " : The landlord of over there at both The James C. Cleveland and Warren B. Rudman Buildings at 53-55 Pleasant Street, Concord, N.H. 03301 for their Article III, Section 1 "inferior Court of Congress" tenant titled: The U.S. District Court.

Question: Now WHO to blame? Answer: 1.) The governor, John H. Lynch of Hopkinton AND 2.) The N.H. Dept. of Safety, Division of State Police, because it is the governor's duty by his RSA Ch. 92 oath to Article 84, see: http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/VI/92/92-2.htm over to http://www.nh.gov/constitution/oaths.html "to execute the laws of the state AND of the United States" http://www.nh.gov/constitution/governor.html by Article 51, Part 2, N.H. (emphasis ADDed) and that he "shall be responsible for" by Article 41, Part 2.  The emphasis ADDed for the latter of the U.S. Codes and Statutes at Large but only for when they have been made "in Pursuance thereof" (with the letter c) by Article VI, Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution, NOT:

pursuant to, with the letter t, as in accordance with, as there is an accord or conditional agreement offered to the Feds, as was done by our N.H. General Court back on June 14, 1883, but that as by the Adams case of 1943, Adams v. United States (1943) 319 US 312, 87 L Ed. 1421, 63 S. Ct. 1122 to be exact, an offer un-accepted is NOT consent! See also:  http://www.givemeliberty.org/RTPLawsuit/Misc/PressStatementSchulz9-16-03.htm  ""In view of 40 USC 255, no jurisdiction exists in United States to enforce federal criminal laws, unless and until consent to accept jurisdiction over lands acquired by United States has been filed in behalf of United States as provided in said section, and fact that state has authorized government to take jurisdiction is immaterial." Adams v. United States (1943) 319 US 312, 87 L Ed. 1421, 63 S. Ct. 1122. (Quoted from U.S. statute 40 USC 255, Interpretive Note #14, citing the US Supreme Court)."

BUT:  the phrase of: "in Pursuance thereof" meaning: "A carrying out or putting into effect".  So WHERE is this "put" of the papers with the office pre-scribed?***  There is none! The Feds who took the oath to abide by the U.S. Constitution, are even in violation of same! See Article I, Section 8, Clause 17, and that they KNOW to be the case, as from the Attorney General Manual #664: http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/eousa/foia_reading_room/usam/title9/crm00664.htm   

*** The Office of New Hampshire Secretary of State by R.S.A. Chapter 123:1 http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/IX/123/123-1.htm

On Tuesday, May 1st, 2007 the undersigned Joseph S. Haas did personally appear before the Sullivan County Commissioners in Newport (County Seat) for the Plainfield property at 401 Center of Town Road owned by the T-Q-S Trust, with follow-up e-mail letter to Sheriff Mike Prozzo on Thu., May 3, 2007 @ 11:53:15 AM AND that I tried to notify the Town of Plainfield Selectmen on June 20, 2007, but had to have Bernie Bastian present the case for to Article 12 protect the inhabitants thereof, both of the ones who did pay the property taxes there (and at the other property, owned by The A-T-T Trust, see below), and their visitors, because Article 12 reads in http://www.nh.gov/constitution/billofrights.html that: "Protection and Taxation Reciprocal...Nor are the inhabitants of this state controllable by any other laws than those to which they, or their representative body, have given their consent." The "other laws" as already described above, and these "inhabitants" defined in Article 30, Part 2 N.H. http://www.nh.gov/constitution/senate.html as: "concerning persons inhabiting or residing, OR BROUGHT, within this state"! (emphasis ADDed!) as annotated with the Barker case, Barker v. Young, 80 N.H. 447, 119A.330, 1922 N.H. LEXIS 51 (October 31, 1922) to be exact.

A pc: of this to incorporate into a lawsuit too for against both: (1) Grafton County (notified by e-mail on: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 01:05:01 by State Rep. Dick Marple, Retired of Hooksett using the e-mail of: armlaw at hotmail.com to dispatch at graftoncountysheriff.net and (2) Sullivan County; for to protect BOTH those people on both properties.  Both these counties paying over $100,000 a year in premiums for "errors and omissions" insurance to the tune of about $5 million each. The property in Lebanon at 27 Glen Road, for which I also alerted the City Council on the night of June 6, 2007 @ about 7:45 p.m. to protect over there too, but who FAILed to protect from the raid of the next day: June 7, 2007.

As for the culpability against the Dept. of Safety, Division of State Police, see the photocopy of this Reply #5165 on page 345 here of 7/30/2007 posted @ 1:46 p.m. that I had printed out @ 2:25 P.M. and gave to The State Police on Fri. 8/31/07 as initialed by me: JSH with the $1.00 bill for The "Ed Brown Protection Fund" but that was refused by Lt. David Gargill with his cover letter of November 2, 2007 (AFTER the Oct. 4, 2007 un-lawful arrests) in an envelope to me postmarked November 5th, 2007 and sent CERTIFIED MAIL 7000-0600-0024-7795-1413 costing the State $5.21.  The point being that whether or not they accepted the $1.00 bill or not, they were noticed to protect and FAILed to do so.  They still owed the inhabitants here the protection as guaranteed by the law, and so for their failure to protect by the law resulting in these $damages then to have to pay such, that of my suggestion being of to lien to a moiety amount of to get half the $amount of the paychecks from Cargill and others now like the Commissioner, his then boss, by like in a Petition for a Writ of Elegit, that was never offered to Elaine Brown in her Dental practice, instead declaring both the State and Federal taxes a debt without having had that Art. 20 jury trial to so determine it as owing! Instead the N.H. Dept. of Revenue subordinates itself to under the Feds for a kick-back! that I find disgusting! This Cargill character now the U.S. Marshal! Thoroughly disgusting!

Yours truly, - - - - - - - - -  Joseph S. Haas, P.O. Box 3842, Concord, N.H. 03302, Tel. 603: 848-6059, e-mail: JosephSHaas at hotmail dot com

[JosephSHaas]

Kat: What the heck is going on here!?  Or should I say of NOT going on!  because after I type a few lines it blinks off!

   Cannot find http://supertoolbar.ask.com/redirect?client=ff&src=kw&tb=WCLV5&o=14201&locale=en_US&q=ask.com     DNS Error - Server cannot be found
Sponsored Results
View Ask Questions Get Answers
Research Ask Questions Get Answers; Find Answers on Ask.com.
Ask.com/Health
Have a Question to Ask?
Find real people to answer your questions on AnybodyOutThere.
www.AnybodyOutThere.com
Free Grants - Never Repay
$12,000,000,000 In Free Grants Are Given Away Monthly - Apply Now
www.ClickHereForUSAGovGrants.com/sh


Browse these related categories:
1.Ask
2.Ask a Nurse
3.Question and Answer
4.Ask a Question
5.Malaysia Kuala Lumpur
   
6.Ask Question Online
7.Go Fish
8.Ask Magazine
9.Ask an Expert
10.Flirt Chat Room
   
11.Video Dating
12.Game Chat Room
13.Christian Chatroom
14.Romance Chats
15.Singles Chat
Try a new search:
Try again by typing the URL here:
Powered by Search Settings
___________________________________________________________________________

Mod: Somehow an ASK dot com virus or something is taking over either my computer or THIS site!

Mod #2: left of screen: white start letters of word in green box, click to Control Panel, over to Add or Remove, I saw ASK as #4 down from top so got rid of these THIEVES, now reporting them to the A.G.'s Office of Consumer Protection! http://doj.nh.gov/consumer/index.html "Consumer Protection
Hotline 1-888-468-4454 Weekdays 9am to 3pm".