Main thread for Ed and Elaine Brown vs the evil IRS, Part 33

[JosephSHaas]

Re: http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090803/FRONTPAGE/908030305

entitled: "Maybe it's* that Federal agent? The 123:1 "deliverer".

of:

"The "state police Major Crime Unit." eh?

So there's a Minor Crime Unit too?

Maybe this guy was that federal agent by N.H. RSA Ch. 123:1  http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/IX/123/123-1.htm and was bumped off on his way to the N.H. Office of Secretary of State to finally file those federal papers, in accordance with 40USC255; see: https://www.oscn.net/applications/oscn/DeliverDocument.asp?CiteID=393575

Nah! I doubt it, because these N.H. State Police Majors and Minors are running with blinders on as like the no-see-um monkeys, they KNOW that Article 12, last sentence  is there http://www.nh.gov/constitution/billofrights.html but refuse to believe that there has been no filing!  even when presented with the proof. Sociopaths in extreme denial! Such as RSA Ch. 643:1 Official Corruption, http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/LXII/643/643-1.htm How can the corruptors investigate the corrupt? Easy: nobody gives a s**t.  "

* Notice I used an it, rather than he, for these government goons! 

[JosephSHaas]

RE: http://www.concordmonitor.info/comment/reply/89935/70006

entitled: "Living Doc. is like changing the rules of the game..."

of:

"...while the game is in motion!

A "living document" in what sense?

I ran into this from Mike Brown, the other day in Washington, D.C. who works for Federal Rep. Carol Shea-Porter as her Chief of staff.  He said that the Constitution is a "living document" in that it is re-defined all the time, like for that "all" word in Art. III, Sec. 2, Clause 3 U.S. of a jury trial for "all" CRIMES, and that the word all now means some, as in only for Class A misdemeanor crimes in N.H. for example, because IF THAT WERE THE CASE TODAY, IF NOT CHANGED BY LEGISLATIVE OVER-RIDE, then the courts would be swamped, because we are a nation of criminals! But isn't a misdemeanor a TYPE of crime, or sub-set of the set!? The statute is there for Class B of a fine-only sentence possible thus not entitling you to an attorney at state expense, NOT that it loses its title! What a George Orwellian "Nineteen Eighty-Four" "Double"-talker!

Criminals-in-government is what we have, of the Legislative branch so wimpy as not to impeach these thieves of our rights, especially when we claim them in writing!

My claim is NOT to be controlled by any other laws (U.S. Codes) other than what the Legislature has consented to, by Art. 12, N.H. and that we gave "consent" to the Feds on June 14, 1883 by RSA 123:1, but that was a "conditional" consent.  The House State-Fed Relations Committee being the parrots to both of that a consent has only one meaning of ANY type of consent, as in you're a human being, and so with equal rights, and so what does that mean? That all cars and trucks are the same because they are vehicles!? And so when conditions are put upon the offer they do not exist!? because the offer must be trim? withOUT any branches!? I think I'll call this crew-cut injustice by bald-face liars! (;-)

Or Brainwashers like this Colby-Sawyer President AND Souter who say we live in a Democracy, or was Souter mis-quoted by this Reporter, as he did make mention of Franklin to a Republic, so long as you can keep it. And so a Democracy withIN a Republic!?  Of course not! The two are of separate circles, or maybe a partial overlap? And us needing to push it back to where it belongs?  A push as in an assault?  No to re-pulse their initial pulse as a trespass upon our rights.  We are allowed to do such by right and it IS our duty too by Article 10 to revolt against this! http://1215.org/lawnotes/lawnotes/repvdem.htm

When was the last time Souter and this College President ever both: (1) SAID the Pledge of Allegiance, and; (2) actually DID live up to it? Those who do not do both are hypocrites and do NOT deserve our respect, and the students sent to there by their parents ought to get their schooling elsewhere where the truth is taught and not from this pack of liars!! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pledge_of_Allegiance for the history; and http://www.ushistory.org/documents/pledge.htm for the words. "

[JosephSHaas]

RE: http://www.concordmonitor.info/comment/reply/89950/70047

entitled: "Plan B to lien federal gas tax receipts."

of:

"4Liberty: reference your: " Even the federal government exempts the first $3.5 million."  What state is that in?  All 50 I presume? But take a look at our N.H. RSA Chapter 123:1 and there being no 40USC255 filing for to apply to us by assertion of our Art. 12-N.H. rights UNLESS we "volunteer".

Thus my Plan B would be to put a lien on ALL the federal gas tax money collected at the pumps, until the Feds stop being the outlaws they are, to comply with the law!"

[JosephSHaas]

RE: http://www.concordmonitor.info/comment/reply/90120/70162

entitled: "Plus: stop the unlawful pensions, and lien that burglar pension!"

of:

"armyvet: Oh to the contrary to some degree. Either they are ignorant as to x% of them you allege, or that they are corrupt, as y% in the know, and for example of the latter of them knowing that when they do take the RSA Ch. 92:2 oath of office http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/VI/92/92-2.htm to the Article 84 wording http://www.nh.gov/constitution/oaths.html of: "WILL faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all duties incumbent on me as ................................................., according to the best of my abilities, agreeably to the rules and regulations of this constitution and laws of the state of New Hampshire." (emphasis ADDed) they do KNOW that the "will" word is for the future tense that never arrived with a due date of something that they should also, as town officials by RSA Ch. 42:1 http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/III/42/42-1.htm also subscribe and carrot that of something to the effect of: I will (future tense) AND DO (now in the present tense) HEREBY.... but that I've NEVER seen such a document!

Notice in paragraphs #3 + 4 of in one breath they/ their attorney #x says that what the state is doing is "illegal", and then in the next paragraph is quoted again for the (same or next?) attorney as what the state is doing is "unconstitutional".  Now which one is it?  Is it against some statute as illegal, or unconstitutional or unlawful, because the constitution IS the law, as there is no such thing as an unlawful law, but an unlawful statute. My presumption is that of Art. I, Sec. 10 U.S. of that the state canNOT impair the obligation of contracts, but that the contract can be declared unlawful.  So I say: go for it! I'd like to put in a Motion to Intervene as a taxpayer to END the state contributions to these not "officials" but "employees" as by 29 US 630 http://law.onecle.com/uscode/29/630.html since the two titles are NOT the same. The reasons as follows:

That although the employees did contribute $x to their retirement fund, then yes, that x% of the fund is contractual and NOT to be touched by the state, and IF the employee does want this $900/month valued health insurance for only $65/month but that "the state is not required to provide a health benefit", then so be it from the state contribution from the General Fund each month, but as spelled out in Article 36 and 36-a of the N.H. Constitution, Part First & Bill of Rights http://www.nh.gov/constitution/billofrights.html of 1784 + 1984 respectfully these pension contributions from the state making up x% of the employer-employee total contributions must be certified on an annual basis, every year to make them lawful, but has this EVER been done?  Who certified the last two years and when, plus where? May I please see their name and title under the State Seal that they have complied with Art. 36 in that this biennial vote every 2-years is NOT annual, and thus is unconstitutional! And especially for the widows and widowers, plus children of those retirees as having NOT done the "actual services", for which the officer or employee should have bought their own life insurance to cover them, and so a cc: of this to the Audit Division of the State in the SE corner, State House, 1st floor there to please look into these unlawful payments to "prompt"ly put a halt to them today! since I've notified former Commissioner Don Hill about this in writing in his Administrative Services, 1st floor State House Annex, when he was there #x years ago and he did nothing about it! re: that list from the AOC (Administrative Office of the Courts) for the judges that he sent withOUT filtering to the State Treasurer for payments.  His retirement checks ought to stop by an investigation this year 2009, or at least to the "moiety" degree of half liened by the "elegit" process to offset the unlawful $amounts he allowed to go through his office unlawfully! "

[JosephSHaas]

RE: http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090804/FRONTPAGE/908040303

entitled: "Is this inmate Houdini, Jr.? (;-)"

of:

"If William Sigmund, the former Superintendent of The Grafton County Jail in North Haverhill were in charge here, this would NOT have happened.

The reason I say this is because that BEFORE an inmate is given any work detail, he must pass the $1.00 bills test, and by that I mean:

when I was up to there as an inmate back in the mid 1980s

(the good-old days when there were only two of us there in the entire jail of four bunks per quad = 8 beds x 4 = 32, Mr. R.B. yes- I do remember his name, how could I not, because he and I were the only ones there before others arrived, like the local drunk on Saturday nights to sleep it off, like Otis, on "The Andy Griffith Show," us playing metal horseshoes in the pit by the grassy yard where neighbors came to visit withOUT having to go through regular screening visits, such as the lady with her dog out on a stroll, R.B. BTW who got a bicycle donated by me to him withOUT transportation so that he could get a job down at the local lumber yard on work release,)

but back to the story: Sigmund's secretary  would invite you into his office to wait for him, and you'd be sitting in the chair and see on his desk #___ $1.00 bills just sitting there. He'd arrive and have a nice chat with you, but that I presume that AFTER you left, he would count the $1.00 bills. (;-) and dish out whatever punishment he felt appropriate if the number he had BEFORE your visit did NOT match the # that was there AFTER the visit.

So HOW could this State Prison inmate get this INto the facility?  Was he NOT searched on his return visit? Or is he like some "Houdini".  That's what my Antique Store tenant used to tell me when I was a landlord.  After some thief took something, he'd tell me that "Houdini" just "paid" him a visit. "

[JosephSHaas]

RE: http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090804/OPINION/908040341

entitled: "Attorneys ought NEVER to be in the House NOR Senate!"

of:

"She's an attorney like Paul Hodes and ought NOT to be in the law-making branch where they are supposed to check-and-balance any and all corruption in the judiciary, by way of Bills of Impeachment if in the House, or to hold a trial for such, if in the Senate.  How many impeachments has Hodes done? 

(reference the Civil Rule 72.5 excuse the Deputy Clerk of the U.S. District Court, Dan Lynch gave to Jane Pauley, his N.H. Chief of Staff in Concord, on North Main Street that he took hook-line and sinker to bury my protest against these illegal trips to Maine in the Ed Brown CRIMINAL case against 18USC3232 that is a crime by THEM! including our former N.H. A.G. Jeffrey R. Howard, who did issue these checks to re-imburse his buddies of the Bar to travel to Portland and back, from his 4th floor office there at the Rudman Building at 53 Pleasant Street for his 1st Circuit Court job of to judge the judges below on appeal, but NOT to be in cahoots WITH them dis-obeying the law as outlaws, and his relative Mark Howard, on the N.H. State Board of Claims to what? quash my complaint #2009-13 against Lynch for not doing his Art. 51 job that he "shall" be "responsible" for by Art. 41 http://www.nh.gov/constitution/governor.html  Yes he tried to dismiss it, but then reversed himself, and now his law partner wants to be the next U.S. Attorney for New Hampshire)

How many do you think Kelly will do IF she is elected? Do you think that THEY will abandon their oaths to protect the brother and sister-hood of the Bar Association? She did take an RSA Ch. 311:6 oath of office http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/XXX/311/311-6.htm that she: "WILL (future tense) do no falsehood, nor consent that any be done IN the court, and if you know of any, that you will give knowledge thereof to the justices of the court, or some of them, that it may be reformed;". (emphasis ADDed).  So did she ever turn that future-tense oath into a signed I do hereby now, present tense, do so honor too?  If not, then WHY not?  And how many, if any wrongs, has she seen that were or were NOT reported to the judges?  And of those #___ of the former, what was done about it/them? And WHY only for what she see as wrongs withIN the court?  Shouldn't some State Rep try to revise this to INclude wrongs done or seen OUTside of court? And was this done "So help you God or under the pains and penalty of perjury."?


I would NEVER vote for an attorney to become either a Federal Rep or U.S. Senator, but then "they" know that, as stated "By ANNMARIE TIMMINS
Monitor staff"   over at http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090803/FRONTPAGE/908030302 for "Civics instruction Souter's priority
Former justice to aid N.H. task force" she wrote in paragraph #4 that: "two-thirds of Americans could not name the three branches of government". So for her to hire an advertising agency to coat her as being an Art. I, Section 8, Clause 9 U.S. Champion for the People, that she is NOT, and especially over the Ed Brown case of her mother* the lobbyist for the telephone company that was asked by the Feds to shut it off, when the Feds have no business here in N.H. until they file their 40USC255 papers with Bill Gardner's Office of Secretary of State as required by the "shall" word in RSA Ch. 123:1 but that Kelly seemed to enjoy her violation of her  RSA Ch. 92:2 other oath of office too!  http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/IX/123/123-1.htm and http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/VI/92/92-2.htm to Art. 84-N.H. at http://www.nh.gov/constitution/oaths.html  Reference:

"see: http://www.oscn.net/applications/oscn/deliverdocument.asp?citeid=393575 plus U.S. Attorney Manual #664 http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/eousa/foia_reading_room/usam/title9/crm00664.htm and: http://www.givemeliberty.org/RTPLawsuit/Misc/PressStatementSchulz9-16-03.htm of: ""In view of 40 USCS 255, no jurisdiction exists in United States to enforce federal criminal laws, unless and until consent to accept jurisdiction over lands acquired by United States has been filed in behalf of United States as provided in said section, and fact that state has authorized government to take jurisdiction is immaterial." Adams v. United States (1943) 319 US 312, 87 L Ed. 1421, 63 S. Ct. 1122. (Quoted from U.S. statute 40 USCS 255, Interpretive Note #14, citing the US Supreme Court)."

* Kathleen Veracco. http://www.sheehan.com/news/articles/Sheehan-Phinney-Capitol-Group-Completes-Acquisition-of-Murphy-Public-Affairs_115.aspx "

[jzacker]

So are there any updates/info on the four brown supporters?  How are they holding up?  Are they being treated ok?

[JosephSHaas]

So are there any updates/info on the four brown supporters?  How are they holding up?  Are they being treated ok?

1. Danny just got out of the Merrimack County Jail in Boscawen, down to N.Y. and last I heard was going back to Indiana.
2. Bob was supposedly in Merrimack too? and so back in West Virginia now?
3. Jason is still sitting in New Jersey.
4. Reno* is still sitting in Oklahoma.

* I think Reno is waiting to see what happens with the Sept. 3rd sentencing if at all for Ed & Elaine, and his**/their appeal before filing that Rule 63 collateral attack AFTER a Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus to be denied by this Singal jerk of a judge.

** I've been told that Danny has a copy of the transcript that IN-cludes all the side-bar discussions, and I'd really be interested in what was said by the bunch of them when Sven tried to enter that copy of the Art. 49 Petition to Reno while on the stand when he said he did nothing to peacefully resolve this (directly), but that Sven never got a chance to ask about this indirect of him signing it and me presenting same for the governor to do his Art. 51 duty for which he is Art. 41 "responsible for" and WILL pay right after my Sept. ___ hearing in The RSA Ch. 541-B:1-23 State Board of Claims in my Oct. 15th '08 case that was not docketed until 2009-13 for some reason, that was suggested for to be dismissed  by the new Chairman Mark Howard, appointed by the Supremes who did away with Danny's appeal, as already explained in detail was that they deviated from the U.S. code (itself NOT supposed to be controllable here without the Consent of the Legislature, by Art. 12), and allowed the Feds to pull there case to there by Removal, but that it was only supposed to be pushed to there by NOT the Intervenor BUT the defendant!

The Legislator's Council for the Petition for Redress of Grievances by Art. 32 to meet on having them and Ed Kelly impeached this month. That is for them to put together a Bill of Impeachment to sponsor and co-sponsor so that when the window of opportunity opens up in September for the House Bills for 2010 to be filed with Legislative Services, as House Rule 36 endorsed with their signatures and District Numbers the House Speaker can by House Rule 4 send it over to the appropriate committee.

Likewise for that other judge Steve Houran, former AAG in Dover who did not give Danny his Art. 14 "complete"ness by hold a hearing on the original Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus! The action of Kelly being his use of the dissenting opinion in that case where you CAN file and prosecute criminal cases here in New Hampshire by Private Prosecution and especially for Official Oppression, as for when I sued Monier for theft by issuing that check to Keith***** that he gave to me as a successor-in-interest to verify their Section 20 deposits by the Coinage Act of 1792 that bounced at the Ocean National Bank not wanting to comply with the law, and so my resulting action against the one who did issue it! and that Jamie Barry, Deputy U.S. Marshal who I did summon to court by service of process against him by Deputy Sheriff, but that he FAILed to show up on the day and time appointed! re: for his simple assault against me for my Free Speech rights down to a Nadir or point amount in what was supposed to be a sixth (6th) Amendment "public" trial, when I called for a "Point of Order". That I later took to the Merrimack County Superior Court for my civil lawsuit for which I paid the filing fee for an Art. 20 jury trial, but that another judge Kathleen McGuire did allow that U.S. Code Removal statute to over-ride my Art. 12 rights as there has been no 40USC255 acceptance of our RSA Ch. 123:1 offer, and she KNOWS it, but did otherwise, and so to have her AND Retired Judge Jean K. (Mrs. Peter Hoe, former State Senator) Burling likewise impeached, re: her doing the same to Ed when he sued the U.S./I.R.S. in Grafton County Superior Court in North Haverhill BEFORE the Feds went after him criminally in retaliation!  Thus to get back to square #1 and finally him and Elaine back to their corporate property as care-takers. 

The Feds having seized the property toward forfeiture to a manceptor under a Sale with all Faults for better or WORSE but withOUT that 40USC255 paperwork for their purchase or "secure hold" since: "Unless the Attorney General gives prior written approval of the sufficiency of the title to land for the purpose for which the property is being acquired by the United States, public money may not be expended for the purchase of the land or any interest therein." The $3 million spent on this operation to be investigated by the Federal Bureau of Audit (F.B.A.)*** (akin to the F.B.I. but better when encountering IN-ternal federal-state corruption) when they did/do the 2007 report in 2008?  Who certified this Annual Report!? WHERE is it? re: https://www.oscn.net/applications/oscn/DeliverDocument.asp?CiteID=393575

Yours truly, - - Joe

*** Actually The Federal Audit Clearinghouse over at: http://harvester.census.gov/fac/ The contact page at: http://harvester.census.gov/fac/FACCONTA.htm = govs.fac at census.gov (301) 763-1551 (voice) (800) 253-0696 (toll free) ****

**** Mr. "Terry" was nice enough to take my call a few minutes ago at about 2:30 p.m. and said that his Supervisor Paul Fite at 301-763-7265 was not in, and that I could leave a voice mail, that I did with my name, e-mail address and tel. # plus a brief message about: (1) the above, and (2) the violations of 18USC3232 of more public monies being illegal expended for illegal travel from N.H. to Maine and back again!

***** Keith having called me just the other day about receiving a letter from some woman of audit about this check, and why it was not cashed, for the reasons above, and that only the tip of the iceberg of this/these checks!  This iceberg as dirty as their ass when they do wipe it with the constitution!

[JosephSHaas]

Typo:

Yes, on a re-read it should read in the ** paragraph of "their" case to there. Sorry; not wanting to correct it ON that page, as the Feds might have already printed this out for "their" cover-up*, THE Feds in this case being the Marshals, so as to KISS: keep it simple stupid, as for when the President's nominee Cargill is asked by the Senators what he would do different as the next U.S. Marshal for N.H.: of to operate by "The Rule of Law"!

* oh, what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive! 

[JosephSHaas]

Here's a copy and paste:

"
RE: (Thank you.) voicemail reply?
From:    Joseph S. Haas (josephshaas at hotmail.com)
Sent:    Tue 8/04/09 3:14 PM
To:    govs.fac at census.gov
Thank you very much.

> From: govs.fac at census.gov
> Subject: voicemail reply
> To: josephshaas at hotmail.com
> Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 15:04:19 -0400
>
>
> Mr. Haas:
>
> I tried to call your number but your phone was off. We are unfamiliar and
> unqualified to reply to the matters of which you spoke in your voicemail.
> It is probably a matter better suited to be handled by the Inspector
> General Office at the Federal agency in question. Here is a link with all
> of the Inspector General office contacts (for each Federal Agency).
> http://www.ignet.gov/igs/homepage1.html
>
> I hope this helps,
> Paul Fite
> Federal Audit Clearinghouse
> (800) 253-0696
>  "

[JosephSHaas]

Here's a copy and paste:

"> From: govs.fac at census.gov
> Subject: voicemail reply
> To: josephshaas at hotmail.com
> Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 15:04:19 -0400
>
> Mr. Haas:
>
> I tried to call your number but your phone was off. We are unfamiliar and
> unqualified to reply to the matters of which you spoke in your voicemail.
> It is probably a matter better suited to be handled by the Inspector
> General Office at the Federal agency in question. Here is a link with all
> of the Inspector General office contacts (for each Federal Agency).
> http://www.ignet.gov/igs/homepage1.html
>
> I hope this helps,
> Paul Fite
> Federal Audit Clearinghouse
> (800) 253-0696
>  "

1.) - a Federal Reserve Board
Elizabeth A. Coleman, Inspector General  [ sender ]

Main Phone Number: (202) 973-5005
Mailing Address: 20th and Constitution Avenue, N.W.; Stop 300; Washington, D.C. 20551
Hotline Number: (800) 827-3340; (202) 452-6400; or:

1.) -b Treasury, Department of the
The Honorable Eric M. Thorson, Inspector General [ receiver ]

Main Phone Number: (202) 622-1090
Mailing Address: 1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.; Washington, D.C. 20220
Hotline Number: (800) 359-3898

Q. Where's the Section 16 gold per The Fed. Res. Act of 1913?

A. _________________________________________________

2.) General Services Administration
The Honorable Brian D. Miller, Inspector General

Main Phone Number: (202) 501-0450
Mailing Address: 18th and F Streets, N.W.; Room 5340, Washington, D.C. 20405
Hotline Number: (800) 424-5210; (202) 501-1780

Government Accountability Office
Frances Garcia, Inspector General

Main Phone Number: (202) 512-5748
Mailing Address: 441 G Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20548
Hotline Number: (866) 680-7963

Q. When are you landlords going to file your 40USC255 papers with us here in N.H.? by RSA Ch. 123:1; reference the Adams case of 1943 in the U.S. Supreme Court.

A. ____________________________________________________________________

3.)  Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration
The Honorable J. Russell George, Inspector General

Main Phone Number: (202) 622-6500
Mailing Address: IG:IG, 700A; 1125 15th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20005
Hotline Number: (800) 366-4484

Q. When are you going to file your 40USC255 papers per N.H. RSA 123:1 so that you can legally tax to collect your 18.4-cents per gallon of gas from us in New Hampshire? [ Re: http://vlex.com/vid/sec-imposition-tax-19211185 of 18.3 + .1 ]

A. _________________________________________________________________

4.) Justice, Department of
The Honorable Glenn Fine, Inspector General

Main Phone Number: (202) 514-3435
Mailing Address: 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.; Suite 4322, Washington, D.C. 20530
Hotline Number: (800) 869-4499

Q 1. Who's going to investigate these illegal expenditures of gas travel checks paid out to these attorneys in violation of 18USC3232?

A 1 . __________________________________________________________________

Q. 2. Who's going to investigate this illegal expenditure of over $3 million in the Ed Brown anti I.R.S. case here in New Hampshire, since the Attorney General NEVER did give [by declaration, since it does not specify "to" whom it shall be delivered and when, unless asked for(?)] "prior written approval of the sufficiency of the title to land for the purpose for which the property is being acquired* by the United States" per 40USC255 * by purchase = "a secure hold" by seizure to forfeiture.

A. 2. __________________________________________________________________

5.) Commerce, Department of
The Honorable Todd J. Zinser, Inspector General

Main Phone Number: (202) 482-4661
Mailing Address: 14th and Constitution Avenue, N.W.; HCHB 7898-C; Washington, D.C. 20230
Hotline Number: (800) 482-5197; (202) 482-2495; Hearing Impaired (800)854-8407

Q. What is the ratio of your commerce coins to that of the constitutional coin? ___: ___ that is supposed to circulate "together" per LBJ's  speech to Congress for the Coinage Act of 1965, in reference to the 29 US 630 http://law.onecle.com/uscode/29/630.html "officers" of government who are supposed to get these quality coins per The Coinage Act of 1792 because they are NOT "employees".

A. _________________________________________________________________

Yours truly, - - - - - - - - - - Joseph S. Haas, P.O. Box 3842, Concord, N.H. 03302, Tel. 603: 848-6059, e-mail: JosephSHaas at hotmail dot com

[JosephSHaas]

RE: http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090804/UPDATE/908049994/1298/UPDATE

entitled: "National Night Out (website)"

of:

"http://www.nationaltownwatch.org/nno/reg.html  and: http://www.nationalnightout.org/nno/about.html

Check this out for New Mexico: http://www.expertrealestatetalk.com/blog/2009/07/28/national-night-out-2009/ to "take a bite out of crime"

includes: N.H. RSA Ch. 643:1 "Official Oppression" too, right? (;-)

A youtube video of 1:13 minute seen 18x for New Haven, Conn.ecticut's 26th Annual events over at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rK-QS9Tqxkg = 1 of 15,000 communities for to form some police-community partnerships*.

* like police-similarity partnership of getting the bad apples out not only from where they do "live" in that same locality, or social group/class, but of similar interests, and NOT the society as a whole, but like I said: of the whole, but with the bad apples OUT of the barrel, the bad ones being of the internal corruptors!

Thus to me it's the same-old same old as they see of the police see and hear about crime, but pass the buck to others when it involves crime by their own brethren in the government sphere of things local-county-state-federal.

There being a State-Federal Relations committee, and so a follow-up news story could be NOT what I did on my summer vacation, but what these #___ Members on this committee** did tonight. (;-)

** http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/house/committees/committeedetails.aspx?code=H25 "

[JosephSHaas]

....

...
1.) -b Treasury, Department of the
The Honorable Eric M. Thorson, Inspector General [ receiver ]

Main Phone Number: (202) 622-1090
Mailing Address: 1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.; Washington, D.C. 20220
Hotline Number: (800) 359-3898

Q. Where's the Section 16 gold per The Fed. Res. Act of 1913?

A. _________________________________________________ ....

What a bunch of crap!  I did call the 800# here for the Treasury and some woman answered, and put me on hold for from 3:54 p.m. to 4:24 p.m. when I finally hung up the phone, as they must have a 4:00 p.m. quitting time, and didn't want to be bothered with having to work these last six (6) minutes, like a lot of stores doing their dusting/ stirring up dust BEFORE the last cash-customer has left!

Anyway I called back but got some recording  after five (5) rings at 4:27 p.m. to press 1 for fraud, 2 for tax, 3 for bonds, and 4 for other; and so presuming that of "other" as maybe there might not be fraud but that of not mal- but mis, as in a mistake, I did press #4 over to press 1 for general info, or 2 for a request to be answered, and so of course I pressed 2, and then was told to call another number 1-800-333-47636 press 0 to speak with someone by the name of Andy who could not tell me if the call was either being monitored now, or recorded for later "quality", and so if either I said what I did of this Section 16 above, and so at least educating* whoever else might be listening before my call back tomorrow I guess to re-call in the morning by pressing 1 for fraud.

Yours truly, - - Joe

* of that the Fed pays 6-cents per FRN x 32 = $1.92 per sheet of ANY denomination from $1.00 to a $100.00 bill, but that they just can't spend it because Sectron 16 of the Act requires so much gold bullion be deposited per pallet of notes monetized.  Not that of "the gold standard" as having been done away with the redemption of the notes into gold coins, but of gold bullion, to sell and buy the silver to melt down and mint into the "dollar" because the "dollar" was never re-defined as LESS # of grains of silver when the price of silver went to over the value of a dollar in the 1960s, but that by the Act of 1965 the commerce coins of the sandwich variety were authorized to go "together" in circulation with the constitutional coin, and that these 29USC630 "officers" of government in the know still collecting these "dollar"s of quality, but leaves the masses to have to get only the commercial coins even when dealing from a government drawer! That is B.S. and I will not stand for it. Me telling Andy of some City Councilors up here in New Hampshire to investigate this "fraud" too.

[JosephSHaas]

Selectmen Meeting tonight @ 7:00 p.m. Plainfield, N.H.  You're all invited. -- Joe

Here's a copy and paste of my letter to them of just a few minutes ago:

"Oaths & Investigation.
From:    Joseph S. Haas (josephshaas at hotmail.com)
Sent:    Wed 8/05/09 8:44 AM
To:    pfofc at plainfieldnh.org
Bcc:    __________________________________________
To: The Board of Selectmen
Plainfield, New Hampshire _______
603: 469-3201
http://www.plainfieldnh.org/

Dear Selectmen:

--This is to follow-up my e-mail letter to you of last Tuesday, July 28th in which I did ask, and continue to do so, that you have available for me to purchase, a copy of each of your RSA Ch. 92:2 and 42:1 oaths of office, plus that of the Police Chief tonight at the start of your 7:00 p.m. 1st + 3rd Wednesdays Meeting of The Board of Selectmen. Plus to have them amended from the will or future tense, to that of you do hereby accept such a task in the present tense. Thus I do not want to see merely you sitting there as officers de-facto, but that of your Art. 8 accounting to my Art. 32 instruction that you now become officers de jure. http://www.state.nh.us/

--As indicated, I've asked Mike Brown, the Chief of Staff at Fed. Rep. Carol Shea-Porter's office in Washington to see about getting me a copy of that 55USC255 document of "prior written approval" by the Attorney General* before public money can be expended to purchase, as defined also as to obtain "a secure hold", and for example of to seize toward forfeiture, of the sufficiency of the title to land, which seizure did occur after the arrest of Ed & Elaine Brown at the 401 Center of Town Road property on Oct. 4, 2007 that is in a corporate name of which they are its caretakers, and by this same 40USC255, in addition to this paragraph #1 to see also paragraph #6 as it relates to our N.H. R.S.A. Ch. 123:1 of not that these papers be filed with the Governor, but with our office of Secretary of State, that has YET to be done, as you have a photocopy already of the gold-sealed certificate of non-filing that is still the case. (1) A copy of page 1 of 2 of the 40USC255 website to give to you tonight, plus:

--Plus that of both: (2) the Bob Schulz website STATEMENT of Sept. 16, 2003, paragraph #7 on page 1 of 4 at the 80% print-out indicating that our RSA 123:1 offer of consent by 1-8-17 U.S. was a "conditional" consent, but that from June 14, 1883 has YET to be accepted, and so there be NO jurisdictional authority here for "them" to effect the U.S. Codes against ANY of our "inhabitants" for which you are NOW by the update of your oaths to "protect" this property and these two caretakers from further harm to their rights to life, liberty** and property for which they paid you this Art. 12 protection money.

--And (3) being the copy of both pages 1+2 of 2 @ 90% of the U.S. Attorney Manual #664 of that by the James v. Drago case of 1937 in 302US134 @ 141 the phrase "other needful building"s in 1-8-17 "embraces courthouses".

--See also the (4a+b) photo page http://www.usdoj.gov/ag/ of our new U.S. Attorney General and the contact page http://www.usdoj.gov/contact-us.html , with click over to the "FOIA Contacts" getting to:

1.) Requests for Attorney General records should specify that Attorney General records are being sought and should be addressed to:

Carmen L. Mallon
Chief of Staff
Office of Information Policy
Department of Justice
Suite 11050
1425 New York Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20530-0001
(202) 514-FOIA

--So would you please write a letter on your Town letterhead to the Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr., who took his oath on Feb. 3, 2009 to please send you this 40USC255, paragraph #1 documentation, if it exists of this "prior written approval", and if not, then to report the wrongful expenditure of public money/ our taxpayer money to the Feds AND the local, county and state expenses too to:

2.) Requests for Office of the Inspector General records should be addressed to:

Deborah Waller, Paralegal Specialist
Office of the Inspector General
Department of Justice
Room 4726
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20530-0001
(202) 616-0646

3.) Then write to Ed & Elaine Brown at The Strafford County Jail, 266 County Farm Road, Dover, N.H. 03820, Tel. 603: 742-3310 that you will be willing to testify at his/her/their Art. 14 hearing for "complete"ness on his/her/their Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus in Equity Case #2009-E-_____ at the Strafford County Superior Court against The Superintendent Warren Dowaliby, with cc: to his bosses, the County Commissioners who I did meet on Thu., July 16th to try to have them void their contract with that federal woman in Washington, D.C. since the Feds have YET to comply with our N.H. RSA 123:1 and so to let me assert my right to "counsel" (as is supposed to be a guarantee by the Sixth (6th) Amendment, U.S.) both Ed & Elaine as offered AND accepted in writing from them, to which these Commissioners are supposed to operate by Art. 12 too, but insist that I "buckle under" and "suck up" to asking the Feds' permission to get on and/or stay on Ed & Elaine's visiting list. My telephone calls to Chief Deputy Marshal Gary DiMartino at his home and office getting me the "royal run-around" as to nowhere. The testimony being of your written request to the U.S. Attorney General of: August ___ remaining un-answered, or that he did reply that they have no such documentation of either this "prior written approval" or this required N.H. RSA Ch. 123:1 filing, that by the governor's oath of office to Art. 51 he shall be "responsible for", and so you're invited to my case #2009-013 against him in the RSA Ch. 541-B:1-23 State Board of Claims set for Sept. ___, 2009 next month (as per my Oct. 15, 2008 filing, that passed the Motion to Dismiss stage by the N.H. A.G.'s office since Lynch has his own PRIVATE counsel!)

Yours truly, - - - - - - - - - - Joseph S. Haas, P.O. Box 3842, Concord, N.H. 03302, Tel. 603: 848-6059, e-mail: JosephSHaas at hotmail dot com

bcc: Bob Schulz "

[JosephSHaas]

Mike Brown: Progress Report requested.

"FW: Oaths & Investigation.
From:    Joseph S. Haas (josephshaas at hotmail.com)
Sent:    Wed 8/05/09 9:52 AM
To:    mike.brown at mail.house.gov
Cc:    olga.clough at mail.house.gov
Bcc:    ________________________________________

Mike, I did just call to FOIA @ the 202: 514-3642 # below and the secretary referred me over to the "Counselor of the day" being Venessa Brinkman, 4 rings got to her voice recorder to where I left a message that I was looking for your FOIA #_____ there of to get this documentation for me for Ed and the authorities up here who "will" be required by that future tense word into the present of a "shall" condition once they do "hereby" agree to this Art. 12 protection of NOT to be a "racket" of doing business to obtain money through fraud of future tense of nothing to be done until that happens and so technically RSA Ch. 637:5 "Theft by Extortion" http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/LXII/637/637-5.htm to which you do NOT want to be a party, right? (;-) since although what they've done +/or not done, as by the commission of accepting the property tax money for a future tense action, since they have omitted such from their present duties to get to this present tense situation, then once activated to "protect" this land and its caretakers from further harm to life, liberty** and property by Article 12, N.H. Constitution, Part First & Bill of Rights, to do the acts #1,2+3 requested in my e-mail to them at exactly 8:44 AM earlier this morning, and your help in getting this 40USC255 paragraph #1 document AND to see to it for WHO that N.H. RSA Ch. 123:1 federal agent is supposed to be in paragraph #6 of 40USC255 to finally:

file these papers of acceptance as offered thus proving the PROOF by receipt of that it was NOT done earlier, and so THE evidence to enter into a Motion in the case #30 here of NEW evidence for a mistrial toward a Federal Writ of Habeas Corpus either at the Concord Court, or by a Rule 63 collateral attack if denied in N.H. but granted in another state where they ARE in compliance to that state statute for them from 1-8-17 U.S. thus finally ending this "racket" of the dishonest practice, as what has been done, or not done is half legal, and so technically illegal until done IF and when any actions against the person and/or property occurs as has already been done, then as I've said this dishonesty to end.

The word dishonest defined as lacking honesty, as in NOT to take unfair advantage of, and really not any advantage at all as in a favorable position, but rigor juris.  The dishonesty being as proceeding from a LACK of probity, as in the deficiency or absence of both these 40USC255 documents!! The probity being: of virtue***, see Art. 38 of the N.H. Constitution too at: http://www.nh.gov/constitution/billofrights.html in that:

[Art.] 38. [Social Virtues Inculcated.] A frequent recurrence to the fundamental principles of the constitution, and a constant adherence to justice, moderation, temperance, industry, frugality, and all the social virtues***, are indispensably necessary to PREserve the blessings of LIBERTY and GOOD government; the people ought, therefore, to have a particular regard to all those principles in the choice of their officers and representatives, AND they have a RIGHT to REQUIRE of their lawgivers and MAGISTRATES, an EXACT and constant observance of them, in the formation and execution of the laws necessary for the good administration of government.
June 2, 1784
Emphasis ADDed because until the exercise of my RIGHT to REQUIRE that they go from the "will" word in the future tense for the RSA 92:2 and 42:1 oaths to the present tense, there is no PREservartion of the LIBERTY of my friends Ed & Elaine Brown, nor my right of counsel to them as by the 6th Amendment, U.S. but of them having been taken away by the BAD government needing to be corrected into GOOD, and so my Art. 32 instruction that they do now Art. 8 "account" for their actions from hereon forward of to Art. 12 protect the life, liberty and property for which they have been paid to do so once activated since these Selectmen are the magistrates or civil officers with power to administer the law, and so to further ...
...protect their life, liberty and property from any more federal aggression by these technical trespassers to our state until they do file their paperwork with the proper authority BEFORE they have jurisdictional authority to effect the U.S. Codes against us inhabitants who have neither given our consent indirectly by our "legislative body" meaning the Legislature or General Court, NOR by our direct consent, especially when we do Art. 10 protest against such usurpation by the Feds of our N.H. rights and the Feds somehow brainwashing the locals, county and state to do their dirty-work for them! that I find thoroughly disgusting! And so my e-mails to hearings on these future bills of impeachment later this month with that Legislators Council for the Petition for Redress of Grievance...
...I do repeat my requests that #1, 2 + 3 here be done by The Selectmen, and with your help please.

Yours truly, -- Joe Haas "